1-triage-issues
Triage backlog, scan open issues, rank what to tackle first, or which PRs are production-ready.
Оригинален текст · няма потвърден превод на българскиПърво прочетете инструкцията.
Файлът се зарежда от посочения източник само по ваше действие. Можете да го прочетете тук, да го копирате или да го запазите като .md.
GitHub хранилище- Звезди на репото
- 3592
- Лиценз
- Apache-2.0
- Последна проверка на записа
- 22.09.2026 г.
Добавете в своя инструмент.
Командата отваря избора на skills от репозитория. Прочетете файла и условията на автора преди изпълнение.
npx skills add stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-serverСтраницата копира текст. Не инсталира и не изпълнява нищо на устройството ви.
Откъс от SKILL.md
Началото на файла на автора, без превод.
Triage open issues and PRs
Turn the live state of stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server into a maintainer priority list. Read-only. No checkout, no labels, no comments, no closure, no reproduction.
Reproduction belongs in /2-repro-issue. PR verification belongs in /3-verify-pr-fix.
Inputs
$ARGUMENTS is optional. If set, treat as a label name (bug, enhancement) or freetext filter. Otherwise scan everything open.
1. Gather
REPO=stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server
# Issues (gh calls the reactions field `reactionGroups`, not `reactions`)
gh issue list --repo $REPO --state open --limit 200 \
--json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,author,comments,reactionGroups,body
# PRs
gh pr list --repo $REPO --state open --limit 100 \
--json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,author,mergeable,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup,additions,deletions,changedFiles,reviewDecision,isDraft,headRepositoryOwner
# Cross-link issues ↔ PRs via body references
gh search prs --repo $REPO --state open --json number,body,title --limit 100
Build a map issue_number → [referencing_pr_numbers] by scanning PR bodies for Closes #, Fixes #, Resolves #, plain #N.
If $ARGUMENTS is given, filter both lists before scoring.
Read each issue body and its comments, including linked canonical issues.
2. Packet admission
Before severity, age, reach, or contributor ranking, classify every open issue.
| Packet state | Maintainer action |
|---|---|
| Material evidence missing | Recommend needs more info with the specific missing fields. Exclude it from the reproduction shortlist. Existing labels alone do not prove completeness. |
| Evidence supplied after a request | Read the new evidence. Recommend removing needs more info only when it resolves the material gap. A new comment does not automatically clear the label. |
| Same underlying report as a canonical issue | Note unique reviewed evidence for the canonical issue. Recommend a Duplicate of #N comment and a separate close, each with an explicit yes. Do not post or close here. |
| Evaluable bug or feature | Continue to scoring. Completeness is not a promise of implementation. |
| Source evidence supports a narrower claim than the reporter's explanation | State that narrower finding. Ask for targeted missing evidence only if the next decision needs it. |