ccg-skills
CCG Skills - Quality gates, documentation generator, and multi-agent orchestration. Auto-installed by CCG workflow system.
Намерете инструкция, прочетете оригиналния файл и подгответе команда за своя инструмент.
31 301 skills в каталога
Как подбирам и измервамДанните имат нужда от нова проверка.Последна успешна проверка: 23.09.2026 г.
Проверката на източника не означава, че всяка инструкция е изпробвана от Level8. Каталогът не обхваща непременно всички публични хранилища.
Търсене в целия индекс. Метаданните показват посоченото от източника; липсващите стойности остават означени.
Датата в GitHub е отделна от първата поява в моя индекс. Филтърът по дата изключва записите без посочено обновяване.
Страница 18: 24 записа в 6 групи по репозиторий. Всички записи от страницата са показани. Номерът пази позицията от избраната подредба.
2 skills от този източник на тази страница
CCG Skills - Quality gates, documentation generator, and multi-agent orchestration. Auto-installed by CCG workflow system.
Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.
1 skill от този източник на тази страница
将 Markdown 报告、研究笔记、行业分析、战略备忘录、技术白皮书、复盘、周报等长文档,重组并创作为有编辑判断、网页美感和证据秩序的自包含 HTML 专题页。用户要求“转成 HTML”“网页化报告”“美化报告”“做成专题页”“便于分享”“提升可读性/设计感”“把报告做成网页”时使用。必须先写 plan.md 再写 HTML,保留原文事实断言和结论强度,不套模板,不做机械 Markdown 转换。
9 skills от този източник на тази страница
This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.
Use for everyday coding tasks that involve writing or modifying source code.
This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.
Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using writing-strategy principles, curated Nature/Nature Communications article patterns, and phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English.
Draft, restructure, or plan Nature-style manuscript sections from author-provided claims, results, figures, notes, or Chinese drafts. Use when the user wants to write or rebuild an abstract, introduction, results narrative, discussion, conclusion, title, or full manuscript argument rather than only polish finished prose.
Use this skill for project-scoped literature review built on Sources/Papers, with synthesis landing in Knowledge, writing handoff in Writing, and the default literature canvas under Maps/literature.canvas.
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.
8 skills от този източник на тази страница
Author and review GitHub Actions workflow YAML safely so syntactically-valid YAML can't ship a workflow that GitHub Actions refuses to run. USE FOR: editing, adding, or reviewing any file under .github/workflows/, writing run-name/name/if/env/run values that contain ${{ }} expressions, diagnosing a run that fails with 'This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue' and no jobs starting, deciding when a workflow scalar must be quoted, validating workflows with actionlint. DO NOT USE FOR
Diagnose and fix under-parallelized MSBuild builds. USE WHEN a multi-project solution build is slower than expected, doesn't speed up when you add cores, pegs a single core while others idle, or you want to know why `-m` isn't helping. Note: `/maxcpucount` default is 1 (sequential) — always pass `-m` for parallel builds. Covers finding the critical path (longest serial ProjectReference chain), graph build (`/graph`), BuildInParallel, and solution filters (`.slnf`). DO NOT USE FOR: single-project
Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK
Correctly call native (C/C++) libraries from .NET using P/Invoke and LibraryImport. Covers function signatures, string marshalling, memory lifetime, SafeHandle, and cross-platform patterns. USE FOR: writing new P/Invoke or LibraryImport declarations, reviewing or debugging existing native interop co
Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optim
Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: l
Guide for theming .NET MAUI apps — light/dark mode via AppThemeBinding, ResourceDictionary theme switching, DynamicResource bindings, system theme detection, and user theme preferences. Use when: "dark mode", "light mode", "theming", "AppThemeBinding", "theme switching", "ResourceDictionary theme",
Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes
1 skill от този източник на тази страница
Analyze PR review comments from a GitHub PR URL. Fetch review comments, verify each finding against the actual codebase, assess validity (correct/incorrect/partial), present a structured summary with recommended actions, and optionally reply to each comment on GitHub. Use when given a PR review URL or when asked to check/analyze PR feedback.
3 skills от този източник на тази страница
Package multiple FHIR R4 resources produced from OpenMed output into a single valid transaction Bundle ready to POST to an EHR, using OpenMed's verified bundle assembler openmed.clinical.exporters.fhir.to_bundle. Covers deterministic urn:uuid fullUrls, automatic in-Bundle reference rewriting, request blocks (method/url) for transaction vs batch, and conditional create. Use after exporting-to-fhir when the user has several Condition/Observation/MedicationStatement resources and wants one transact
Audit an OpenMed NER or de-identification model for performance disparities across demographic subgroups (sex, age band, race/ethnicity when available) using openmed.eval.fairness_report. Use when the user wants per-subgroup recall and leakage, wants to check whether de-identification under-protects a group, wants to surface a documentation gap where subgroup data is missing, or needs equalized-odds-style disparity numbers for a clinical model. Trigger on \"fairness\", \"subgroup\", \"bias audit
Generate a model card for an OpenMed clinical NER or de-identification model documenting intended use, quantitative metrics, subgroup performance, limitations, and a medical-device disclaimer for clinical AI governance. Use when the user wants to write or update a model card, a README model section, or governance documentation, or to turn OpenMed eval outputs (release gate report, fairness_report, error_report) into the card's metrics and limitations sections. Trigger on \"model card\", \"intend
Пазя съществуващия каталог и добавям намерени SKILL.md файлове след прочит на метаданните. Наличният индекс остава използваем, когато проверката е частична.
Платформата и нивото описват записаното в източника. Те не са гаранция за съвместимост. Български текст се показва само когато в каталога има отделен превод; иначе виждате оригинала с означен език.
Общите звезди показват натрупана популярност. За „Набират интерес“ се сравнява измереният темп при достатъчен интервал. ≥ означава непълна извадка. Под един час не изчислявам дневен темп; методът и изминалият период се показват до записа.
Проверете файла, лиценза и нужния достъп преди употреба. Нито каталогът, нито четенето на SKILL.md изпълняват външни инструкции.
Темата Agent Skills в GitHub