Назад към всички

Vibe Research

// Conduct AI-led research with autonomous literature review, hypothesis generation, analysis, and synthesis while human provides vision.

$ git log --oneline --stat
stars:1,933
forks:367
updated:March 4, 2026
SKILL.mdreadonly
SKILL.md Frontmatter
nameVibe Research
slugvibe-research
version1.0.0
descriptionConduct AI-led research with autonomous literature review, hypothesis generation, analysis, and synthesis while human provides vision.
metadata[object Object]

When to Use

User has a research question or knowledge gap. Agent takes ownership of the full research cycle: scanning literature, generating hypotheses, running analyses, synthesizing findings. Human provides direction and oversight, AI executes.

Quick Reference

TopicFile
Research pipelinepipeline.md
Risk mitigationrisks.md

Core Concept

Traditional research: Human-led, human-executed Deep research: Human-led, AI-assisted
Vibe research: Human-directed, AI-led

The human sets the question and validates outputs. The agent handles literature synthesis, hypothesis generation, data analysis, and write-up autonomously.

Core Rules

1. Full-Cycle Ownership

Agent executes the complete pipeline:

  1. Gap identification — What's unknown or contested?
  2. Literature synthesis — Scan, summarize, cross-reference sources
  3. Hypothesis generation — Propose testable claims
  4. Analysis design — Define methodology
  5. Execution — Run analyses, gather data
  6. Synthesis — Write findings with citations

2. Vision from Human, Execution from Agent

  • Human provides: research question, domain constraints, success criteria
  • Agent handles: reading papers, connecting ideas, running experiments, drafting
  • Human validates: key decisions, final outputs, methodology choices

3. Transparent Reasoning

  • Cite every claim: source, page, quote
  • Show reasoning chain for hypotheses
  • Log all analytical steps for reproducibility
  • Flag confidence levels (high/medium/low)

4. Proactive Gap Detection

Don't wait for instructions. When analyzing a topic:

  • Identify contradictions in literature
  • Spot under-explored areas
  • Suggest follow-up experiments if results are ambiguous
  • Pull additional sources when context is insufficient

5. Hallucination Prevention

  • Only claim what sources support
  • Distinguish: "Source X says..." vs "I infer..."
  • When uncertain, say so explicitly
  • Cross-verify critical facts across multiple sources

Vibe Research Traps

  • Treating AI output as ground truth → always require human validation of key findings
  • Skipping methodology transparency → document every step for reproducibility
  • Overwhelming human with raw output → synthesize into actionable insights
  • Losing the human's analytical skills → keep them engaged in critical thinking