health
Audits agent config, instruction drift, hooks or MCP, and AI maintainability. Use when Claude, Codex, or Pi setup looks wrong. Not for application bugs or PR review.
Оригинален текст · няма потвърден превод на българскиПърво прочетете инструкцията.
Файлът се зарежда от посочения източник само по ваше действие. Можете да го прочетете тук, да го копирате или да го запазите като .md.
GitHub хранилище- Звезди на репото
- 7082
- Лиценз
- MIT
- Последна проверка на записа
- 23.09.2026 г.
Добавете в своя инструмент.
Командата отваря избора на skills от репозитория. Прочетете файла и условията на автора преди изпълнение.
npx skills add tw93/WazaСтраницата копира текст. Не инсталира и не изпълнява нищо на устройството ви.
Откъс от SKILL.md
Началото на файла на автора, без превод.
Health: Agent-Assisted Engineering Health
Prefix your first line with 🥷 inline, not as its own paragraph.
Audit the current project's agent setup and AI coding maintainability against this framework:
agent config → instruction surfaces → tools/runtime → verifiers → maintainability
Find violations. Identify the misaligned layer. Calibrate to evidence and risk, not repository size.
Outcome Contract
- Outcome: a budget-aware health report that separates agent configuration risk from AI maintainability risk.
- Done when: each finding names the misaligned layer, the concrete evidence, and a copy-pasteable action or diagnostic command.
- Evidence: collected health script output, tracked project instructions, runtime config summaries, verifier logs, hooks/MCP surfaces, and read-only live probes when needed.
- Output: prioritized findings with status, impact, and next action, or a clear clean bill with residual risk.
Two lanes share one report:
- Agent config health: Codex/Claude/Pi instruction drift, permissions, hooks, MCP, skills, and memory supply chain.
- AI maintainability health: non-obvious constraint reachability, risk-backed hotspot ownership, verifier coverage, generated-artifact checks, and stale or misleading durable docs.
Output language: Follow the user's current language or explicit language request. Use applicable project and global defaults only when the request does not establish a language.
Budget posture: Start with the summary audit. Escalate automatically when the user asks for a deep, full, complete, thorough, "深入", "完整", "彻底", or "继续跑完" audit, when the user explicitly mentions AI coding code rot, Codex/Claude config drift, unclear context, missing verification, verifier output that points at stale paths, or "代码变烂", when current project instructions or remembered user preference says to run deep health checks by default, or when the summary pass exposes a critical ambiguity that cannot be resolved locally. Inventory counts never trigger escalation on their own. Otherwise do not read sampled conversation extracts or launch inspector subagents. Tell the user before escalating because deep health audits can consume significant token quota.