Към всички skills

researcher-hand-skill

RightNow-AI · Данни и AI

Expert knowledge for AI deep research — methodology, source evaluation, search optimization, cross-referencing, synthesis, and citation formats

Оригинален текст · няма потвърден превод на български

Теми: agent-framework · ai-agents · llm · mcp · open-source · openclaw · operating-system · rust

Първо прочетете инструкцията.

Файлът се зарежда от посочения източник само по ваше действие. Можете да го прочетете тук, да го копирате или да го запазите като .md.

Оригинален SKILL.md
GitHub хранилище
Звезди на репото
18 211
Лиценз
Apache-2.0
Последна проверка на записа
20.09.2026 г.

Добавете в своя инструмент.

Командата отваря избора на skills от репозитория. Прочетете файла и условията на автора преди изпълнение.

npx skills add RightNow-AI/openfang

Страницата копира текст. Не инсталира и не изпълнява нищо на устройството ви.

Откъс от SKILL.md

Началото на файла на автора, без превод.

Deep Research Expert Knowledge

Research Methodology

Research Process (5 phases)

  1. Define: Clarify the question, identify what's known vs unknown, set scope
  2. Search: Systematic multi-strategy search across diverse sources
  3. Evaluate: Assess source quality, extract relevant data, note limitations
  4. Synthesize: Combine findings into coherent answer, resolve contradictions
  5. Verify: Cross-check critical claims, identify remaining uncertainties

Question Types & Strategies

Question TypeStrategyExample
FactualFind authoritative primary source"What is the population of Tokyo?"
ComparativeMulti-source balanced analysis"React vs Vue for large apps?"
CausalEvidence chain + counterfactuals"Why did Theranos fail?"
PredictiveTrend analysis + expert consensus"Will quantum computing replace classical?"
How-toStep-by-step from practitioners"How to set up a Kubernetes cluster?"
SurveyComprehensive landscape mapping"What are the options for vector databases?"
ControversialMultiple perspectives + primary sources"Is remote work more productive?"

Decomposition Technique

Complex questions should be broken into sub-questions:

Main: "Should our startup use microservices?"
Sub-questions:
  1. What are microservices? (definitional)
  2. What are the benefits vs monolith? (comparative)
  3. What team size/stage is appropriate? (contextual)
  4. What are the operational costs? (factual)
  5. What do similar startups use? (case studies)
  6. What are the migration paths? (how-to)

CRAAP Source Evaluation Framework

Currency

  • When was it published or last updated?
  • Is the information still current for the topic?
  • Are the links functional?
  • For technology topics: anything >2 years old may be outdated

Relevance

  • Does it directly address your question?
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Is the level of detail appropriate?
  • Would you cite this in your report?

Authority

  • Who is the author? What are their credentials?
  • What institution published this?
  • Is there contact information?
  • Does the URL domain indicate authority? (.gov, .edu, reputable org)

Accuracy

  • Is the information supported by evidence?
  • Has it been reviewed or refereed?
  • Can you verify the claims from other sources?
  • Are there factual errors, typos, or broken logic?

Целият SKILL.md в GitHub