evidence-driven-writing
Use when writing or revising Introduction, Related Work, background, literature synthesis, or any section where references must drive claims
Оригинален текст · няма потвърден превод на българскиПърво прочетете инструкцията.
Файлът се зарежда от посочения източник само по ваше действие. Можете да го прочетете тук, да го копирате или да го запазите като .md.
GitHub хранилище- Звезди на репото
- 3258
- Лиценз
- MIT
- Последна проверка на записа
- 22.09.2026 г.
Добавете в своя инструмент.
Командата отваря избора на skills от репозитория. Прочетете файла и условията на автора преди изпълнение.
npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skillСтраницата копира текст. Не инсталира и не изпълнява нищо на устройството ви.
Откъс от SKILL.md
Началото на файла на автора, без превод.
Evidence-Driven Writing
This skill turns a literature pool into manuscript argument. It is required for Introduction, Related Work, and any background section with citations.
Hard Gate
Do not write the section until an evidence map and paragraph blueprint exist.
Required artifacts:
refs/evidence-map.mdorplan/evidence-map.mdplan/chapter-blueprints/<section>-blueprint.mdplan/review/evidence-coverage.md
Evidence Map
Create one row per usable source:
| Source ID | Citation | Source type | Abstract-level finding | Usable fact | Supported claim | Citation slot | Risk |
|---|
Rules:
- Use the user's literature pool first.
- Use only information present in title, abstract, DOI metadata, or user-provided notes unless full text is available.
- One citation must support one concrete claim, not a vague field statement.
- Mark weak or indirect support as
Risk: indirect.
Paragraph Blueprint
For each paragraph, define:
### Paragraph N
- Role: context / method landscape / limitation / gap / contribution
- Main claim:
- Evidence IDs:
- Contrast or transition:
- Forbidden content:
Only after the blueprint is complete may manuscript prose be written.
Introduction Pattern
A publishable technical Introduction usually follows this chain:
- Application context and why the problem matters, supported by foundational or survey citations.
- Existing technical routes, grouped by method family rather than by paper list.
- Bottleneck cascade: what each route solves and what remains unsolved.
- Specific research gap that the proposed method can realistically address.
- Contributions written as prose or a short list only if the target style allows it.
For computer science / engineering SCI drafts, integrate the most relevant related-work synthesis into the Introduction unless the locked outline explicitly requires a standalone Related Work chapter. The section must read as an argument: field pressure, existing routes, unresolved bottleneck, proposed position, and contribution boundary.
Do not end the Introduction with a long mechanical chapter map. One concise manuscript-organization paragraph is enough.
Related Work Pattern
Organize by theme, not by chronological paper dump: