fatigue-analysis
// Specialized skill for fatigue life assessment and durability prediction under cyclic loading conditions
$ git log --oneline --stat
stars:384
forks:73
updated:March 4, 2026
SKILL.mdreadonly
SKILL.md Frontmatter
namefatigue-analysis
descriptionSpecialized skill for fatigue life assessment and durability prediction under cyclic loading conditions
allowed-toolsRead,Write,Glob,Grep,Bash
metadata[object Object]
Fatigue Life Prediction Skill
Purpose
The Fatigue Life Prediction skill provides specialized capabilities for assessing fatigue life and durability under cyclic loading conditions, enabling systematic evaluation of component life using stress-life, strain-life, and fracture mechanics approaches.
Capabilities
- Stress-life (S-N) curve application and analysis
- Strain-life (epsilon-N) methodology implementation
- Fracture mechanics crack growth prediction (NASGRO, AFGROW)
- Load spectrum development and cycle counting (rainflow)
- Damage accumulation using Miner's rule
- Mean stress correction methods (Goodman, Gerber, Soderberg)
- Multiaxial fatigue assessment
- Fatigue report generation with life predictions
Usage Guidelines
Fatigue Analysis Approaches
Stress-Life Method (S-N)
-
Application
- High-cycle fatigue (N > 10^4 cycles)
- Elastic stress conditions
- Rotating machinery, vibration loading
-
S-N Curve Development
S = A * N^b Where: S = stress amplitude N = cycles to failure A, b = material constants -
Endurance Limit Modifiers
Se = Se' * ka * kb * kc * kd * ke * kf Where: ka = surface factor kb = size factor kc = load factor kd = temperature factor ke = reliability factor kf = miscellaneous effects
Strain-Life Method (epsilon-N)
-
Application
- Low-cycle fatigue (N < 10^4 cycles)
- Plastic strain present
- Notched components
-
Coffin-Manson Equation
epsilon_a = (sigma_f'/E) * (2Nf)^b + epsilon_f' * (2Nf)^c Where: epsilon_a = strain amplitude sigma_f' = fatigue strength coefficient b = fatigue strength exponent epsilon_f' = fatigue ductility coefficient c = fatigue ductility exponent -
Neuber's Rule for Notches
(Kt * S)^2 / E = sigma * epsilon
Fracture Mechanics
-
Application
- Damage tolerance analysis
- Crack growth life prediction
- Inspection interval determination
-
Paris Law
da/dN = C * (delta_K)^m Where: da/dN = crack growth rate delta_K = stress intensity factor range C, m = material constants -
Stress Intensity Factor
K = beta * S * sqrt(pi * a) Where: beta = geometry factor S = remote stress a = crack length
Load Spectrum Development
-
Rainflow Cycle Counting
- Extract cycles from complex load history
- Identify cycle ranges and means
- Generate cycle count matrix
-
Damage Summation
D = sum(ni/Ni) Failure when D >= 1.0 -
Load Sequence Effects
- Consider overload retardation
- Evaluate block loading effects
- Apply appropriate interaction models
Mean Stress Corrections
| Method | Equation | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Goodman | Sa/Se + Sm/Su = 1 | Conservative, most common |
| Gerber | Sa/Se + (Sm/Su)^2 = 1 | Less conservative |
| Soderberg | Sa/Se + Sm/Sy = 1 | Very conservative |
| Morrow | Sa/Se + Sm/sigma_f' = 1 | Strain-life approach |
Process Integration
- ME-008: Fatigue Life Prediction
Input Schema
{
"component": "string",
"material": {
"name": "string",
"Su": "number (Pa)",
"Sy": "number (Pa)",
"Se_prime": "number (Pa)",
"sigma_f_prime": "number (Pa)",
"epsilon_f_prime": "number",
"b": "number",
"c": "number"
},
"loading": {
"type": "constant_amplitude|spectrum",
"stress_amplitude": "number (Pa)",
"mean_stress": "number (Pa)",
"spectrum_file": "string (if spectrum)"
},
"geometry": {
"Kt": "number (stress concentration)",
"surface_finish": "string",
"size": "number (mm)"
},
"target_life": "number (cycles)",
"reliability": "number (0-1)"
}
Output Schema
{
"fatigue_life": {
"predicted_cycles": "number",
"safety_factor": "number",
"critical_location": "string"
},
"damage_summary": {
"total_damage": "number",
"damage_by_range": "array"
},
"analysis_details": {
"method_used": "string",
"mean_stress_correction": "string",
"modifying_factors": "object"
},
"recommendations": {
"design_changes": "array",
"inspection_interval": "number (if applicable)"
}
}
Best Practices
- Use appropriate method for expected life regime (HCF vs LCF)
- Include all relevant modifying factors
- Account for mean stress effects
- Validate material properties from tested data
- Consider multiaxial stress states for complex loading
- Apply appropriate safety factors per industry standards
Integration Points
- Connects with FEA Structural for stress inputs
- Feeds into Test Planning for validation requirements
- Supports Material Selection for fatigue-resistant materials
- Integrates with Design Review for life certification