Назад към всички

cvpr-pdf-two-pass-review

// Analyze uploaded CVPR paper PDFs with a strict two-pass workflow. First pass extracts verifiable facts with page/section/figure/table evidence only. Second pass produces a 2000-3000 Chinese research critique grounded in those facts. Use when the user uploads a paper PDF and asks for deep interpretat

$ git log --oneline --stat
stars:1,933
forks:367
updated:March 4, 2026
SKILL.mdreadonly
SKILL.md Frontmatter
namecvpr-pdf-two-pass-review
descriptionAnalyze uploaded CVPR paper PDFs with a strict two-pass workflow. First pass extracts verifiable facts with page/section/figure/table evidence only. Second pass produces a 2000-3000 Chinese research critique grounded in those facts. Use when the user uploads a paper PDF and asks for deep interpretation, critical review, reproducibility assessment, or PhD-level reading notes.

CVPR PDF Two-Pass Review

Overview

Run a deterministic two-pass paper analysis workflow on an uploaded PDF. Prioritize evidence-grounded outputs and reduce hallucinations by separating fact extraction from interpretation.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user has uploaded the PDF in the current chat. If not, ask them to upload it first.
  2. Load and execute prompt in references/round1.md to produce a structured fact sheet.
  3. Load and execute prompt in references/round2.md using only round-1 facts plus PDF evidence.
  4. Enforce evidence tags for core claims: [Evidence: p.X, Sec.Y, Fig/Table Z].
  5. If any required information is missing, explicitly state Not provided in paper or Insufficient evidence.

Output Rules

  • Keep analysis strictly based on uploaded PDF content.
  • Do not introduce external papers, benchmarks, or assumptions unless user explicitly asks.
  • Keep language concise and technical.
  • Preserve required length in pass 2: 2000-3000 words or characters as requested by the prompt.

References

  • Round 1 prompt: references/round1.md
  • Round 2 prompt: references/round2.md