Назад към всички

complexity-analyzer

// Automated Big-O complexity analysis of code and algorithms. Performs static analysis of loop structures, recursive call trees, space complexity estimation, and amortized analysis with detailed derivation documents.

$ git log --oneline --stat
stars:384
forks:73
updated:March 4, 2026
SKILL.mdreadonly
SKILL.md Frontmatter
namecomplexity-analyzer
descriptionAutomated Big-O complexity analysis of code and algorithms. Performs static analysis of loop structures, recursive call trees, space complexity estimation, and amortized analysis with detailed derivation documents.
allowed-toolsBash, Read, Write, Grep, Glob
metadata[object Object]

complexity-analyzer

A specialized skill for automated analysis of algorithm time and space complexity, providing Big-O notation analysis, detailed derivations, and optimization recommendations.

Purpose

Analyze code and algorithms to determine:

  • Time complexity (Big-O, Big-Omega, Big-Theta)
  • Space complexity (auxiliary and total)
  • Amortized complexity for data structure operations
  • Complexity derivation with step-by-step reasoning
  • Optimization opportunities and bottleneck identification

Capabilities

Core Analysis Features

  1. Static Analysis

    • Loop structure analysis (nested loops, dependent bounds)
    • Recursive call tree analysis
    • Function call graph traversal
    • Branch condition impact analysis
  2. Complexity Types

    • Time Complexity: Worst, average, and best case analysis
    • Space Complexity: Stack space, heap allocations, auxiliary space
    • Amortized Analysis: Aggregate, accounting, and potential methods
    • Recurrence Relations: Master theorem, substitution method
  3. Output Formats

    • Big-O notation with detailed derivation
    • Complexity comparison tables
    • Visual complexity graphs
    • Optimization recommendations

Supported Languages

  • Python (primary)
  • C++ (full support)
  • Java (full support)
  • JavaScript/TypeScript (full support)
  • Go, Rust, C (partial support)

Integration Options

MCP Servers

AST MCP Server - Advanced code structure analysis:

# Provides AST parsing and complexity analysis
npm install -g @angrysky56/ast-mcp-server

Code Analysis MCP - Natural language code exploration:

# Deep code understanding with data flow analysis
npm install -g code-analysis-mcp

Web-Based Tools

Usage

Analyze Code Complexity

# Analyze a Python function
complexity-analyzer analyze --file solution.py --function two_sum

# Analyze C++ code with detailed derivation
complexity-analyzer analyze --file solution.cpp --verbose

# Compare multiple implementations
complexity-analyzer compare --files impl1.py impl2.py impl3.py

Example Analysis

Input Code:

def find_pairs(arr, target):
    n = len(arr)
    result = []
    for i in range(n):           # O(n)
        for j in range(i+1, n):  # O(n-i) iterations
            if arr[i] + arr[j] == target:
                result.append((i, j))
    return result

Analysis Output:

Time Complexity: O(n^2)
- Outer loop: n iterations
- Inner loop: (n-1) + (n-2) + ... + 1 = n(n-1)/2 iterations
- Total: O(n^2)

Space Complexity: O(k) where k = number of pairs found
- result array grows with matches
- Worst case: O(n^2) if all pairs match

Optimization Suggestion:
- Use hash table for O(n) time complexity
- Trade space for time: O(n) space

Output Schema

{
  "analysis": {
    "function": "string",
    "language": "string",
    "timeComplexity": {
      "notation": "O(n^2)",
      "bestCase": "O(1)",
      "averageCase": "O(n^2)",
      "worstCase": "O(n^2)",
      "derivation": [
        "Step 1: Outer loop runs n times",
        "Step 2: Inner loop runs (n-1), (n-2), ..., 1 times",
        "Step 3: Total = sum from 1 to n-1 = n(n-1)/2",
        "Step 4: Simplify to O(n^2)"
      ]
    },
    "spaceComplexity": {
      "notation": "O(n)",
      "auxiliary": "O(n)",
      "total": "O(n)",
      "breakdown": {
        "input": "O(n) - input array",
        "result": "O(k) - output pairs",
        "variables": "O(1) - loop counters"
      }
    },
    "recommendations": [
      {
        "type": "optimization",
        "description": "Use hash table approach",
        "newComplexity": "O(n) time, O(n) space",
        "tradeoff": "Space for time"
      }
    ]
  },
  "metadata": {
    "analyzedAt": "ISO8601 timestamp",
    "confidence": "high|medium|low"
  }
}

Analysis Patterns

Loop Analysis

PatternComplexityExample
Single loopO(n)for i in range(n)
Nested independentO(n*m)for i in n: for j in m
Nested dependentO(n^2)for i in n: for j in range(i)
LogarithmicO(log n)while n > 0: n //= 2
Nested logO(n log n)for i in n: j=1; while j<n: j*=2

Recursion Analysis

PatternRecurrenceComplexity
LinearT(n) = T(n-1) + O(1)O(n)
BinaryT(n) = T(n/2) + O(1)O(log n)
Divide & ConquerT(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n)O(n log n)
ExponentialT(n) = 2T(n-1) + O(1)O(2^n)

Master Theorem

For recurrence T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n):

CaseConditionComplexity
1f(n) = O(n^c) where c < log_b(a)O(n^(log_b(a)))
2f(n) = O(n^c) where c = log_b(a)O(n^c log n)
3f(n) = O(n^c) where c > log_b(a)O(f(n))

Integration with Processes

This skill enhances:

  • complexity-optimization - Identify and fix complexity bottlenecks
  • leetcode-problem-solving - Verify solution complexity
  • algorithm-implementation - Validate implementation efficiency
  • code-review - Complexity-focused code review

Common Complexity Classes

ComplexityNameExample
O(1)ConstantArray access, hash lookup
O(log n)LogarithmicBinary search
O(n)LinearArray traversal
O(n log n)LinearithmicMerge sort, heap sort
O(n^2)QuadraticNested loops, bubble sort
O(n^3)CubicMatrix multiplication (naive)
O(2^n)ExponentialSubsets, recursive fibonacci
O(n!)FactorialPermutations

Error Handling

ErrorCauseResolution
PARSE_ERRORInvalid syntaxCheck code syntax
UNSUPPORTED_CONSTRUCTComplex control flowSimplify or annotate
RECURSIVE_DEPTHDeep recursionProvide base case hints
AMBIGUOUS_BOUNDSDynamic loop boundsAnnotate with constraints

Best Practices

  1. Annotate Constraints: Provide variable ranges for accurate analysis
  2. Isolate Functions: Analyze one function at a time
  3. Consider Input Distribution: Specify if average case differs from worst
  4. Review Derivations: Verify step-by-step reasoning
  5. Test with Benchmarks: Validate theoretical analysis empirically

References